1065.307—Linearity verification.

(a) Scope and frequency. Perform a linearity verification on each measurement system listed in Table 1 of this section at least as frequently as indicated in the table, consistent with measurement system manufacturer recommendations and good engineering judgment. Note that this linearity verification may replace requirements we previously referred to as “calibrations”. The intent of a linearity verification is to determine that a measurement system responds proportionally over the measurement range of interest. A linearity verification generally consists of introducing a series of at least 10 reference values to a measurement system. The measurement system quantifies each reference value. The measured values are then collectively compared to the reference values by using a least squares linear regression and the linearity criteria specified in Table 1 of this section.

(b) Performance requirements. If a measurement system does not meet the applicable linearity criteria in Table 1 of this section, correct the deficiency by re-calibrating, servicing, or replacing components as needed. Repeat the linearity verification after correcting the deficiency to ensure that the measurement system meets the linearity criteria. Before you may use a measurement system that does not meet linearity criteria, you must demonstrate to us that the deficiency does not adversely affect your ability to demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards.

(c) Procedure. Use the following linearity verification protocol, or use good engineering judgment to develop a different protocol that satisfies the intent of this section, as described in paragraph (a) of this section:

(1) In this paragraph (c), we use the letter “y ” to denote a generic measured quantity, the superscript over-bar to denote an arithmetic mean (such as y ), and the subscript “ref ” to denote the known or reference quantity being measured.

(2) Operate a measurement system at its specified temperatures, pressures, and flows. This may include any specified adjustment or periodic calibration of the measurement system.

(3) Zero the instrument as you would before an emission test by introducing a zero signal. Depending on the instrument, this may be a zero-concentration gas, a reference signal, a set of reference thermodynamic conditions, or some combination of these. For gas analyzers, use a zero gas that meets the specifications of § 1065.750 and introduce it directly at the analyzer port.

(4) Span the instrument as you would before an emission test by introducing a span signal. Depending on the instrument, this may be a span-concentration gas, a reference signal, a set of reference thermodynamic conditions, or some combination of these. For gas analyzers, use a span gas that meets the specifications of § 1065.750 and introduce it directly at the analyzer port.

(5) After spanning the instrument, check zero with the same signal you used in paragraph (c)(3) of this section. Based on the zero reading, use good engineering judgment to determine whether or not to rezero and or re-span the instrument before proceeding to the next step.

(6) For all measured quantities, use instrument manufacturer recommendations and good engineering judgment to select reference values, y refi, that cover a range of values that you expect would prevent extrapolation beyond these values during emission testing. We recommend selecting a zero reference signal as one of the reference values of the linearity verification. For pressure, temperature, dewpoint, and GC-ECD linearity verifications, we recommend at least three reference values. For all other linearity verifications select at least ten reference values.

(7) Use instrument manufacturer recommendations and good engineering judgment to select the order in which you will introduce the series of reference values. For example you may select the reference values randomly to avoid correlation with previous measurements, you may select reference values in ascending or descending order to avoid long settling times of reference signals, or as another example you may select values to ascend and then descend which might incorporate the effects of any instrument hysteresis into the linearity verification.

(8) Generate reference quantities as described in paragraph (d) of this section. For gas analyzers, use gas concentrations known to be within the specifications of § 1065.750 and introduce them directly at the analyzer port.

(9) Introduce a reference signal to the measurement instrument.

(10) Allow time for the instrument to stabilize while it measures the reference value. Stabilization time may include time to purge an instrument and time to account for its response.

(11) At a recording frequency of at least f Hz, specified in Table 1 of § 1065.205, measure the reference value for 30 seconds (you may select a longer sampling period if the recording update frequency is less than 0.5 Hz) and record the arithmetic mean of the recorded values, y i. Refer to § 1065.602 for an example of calculating an arithmetic mean.

(12) Repeat steps in paragraphs (c)(9) through (11) of this section until all reference quantities are measured.

(13) Use the arithmetic means, yi, and reference values, yrefi, to calculate least-squares linear regression parameters and statistical values to compare to the minimum performance criteria specified in Table 1 of this section. Use the calculations described in § 1065.602. Using good engineering judgment, you may weight the results of individual data pairs (i.e., (yrefi, yi )), in the linear regression calculations.

(d) Reference signals. This paragraph (d) describes recommended methods for generating reference values for the linearity-verification protocol in paragraph (c) of this section. Use reference values that simulate actual values, or introduce an actual value and measure it with a reference-measurement system. In the latter case, the reference value is the value reported by the reference-measurement system. Reference values and reference-measurement systems must be NIST-traceable. We recommend using calibration reference quantities that are NIST-traceable within 0.5% uncertainty, if not specified otherwise in other sections of this part 1065. Use the following recommended methods to generate reference values or use good engineering judgment to select a different reference:

(1) Speed. Run the engine or dynamometer at a series of steady-state speeds and use a strobe, a photo tachometer, or a laser tachometer to record reference speeds.

(2) Torque. Use a series of calibration weights and a calibration lever arm to simulate engine torque. You may instead use the engine or dynamometer itself to generate a nominal torque that is measured by a reference load cell or proving ring in series with the torque-measurement system. In this case use the reference load cell measurement as the reference value. Refer to § 1065.310 for a torque-calibration procedure similar to the linearity verification in this section.

(3) Electrical power. Use a controlled source of current and a watt-hour standard reference meter. Complete calibration systems that contain a current source and a reference watt-hour meter are commonly used in the electrical power distribution industry and are therefore commercially available.

(4) Fuel rate. Operate the engine at a series of constant fuel-flow rates or re-circulate fuel back to a tank through the fuel flow meter at different flow rates. Use a gravimetric reference measurement (such as a scale, balance, or mass comparator) at the inlet to the fuel-measurement system. Use a stopwatch or timer to measure the time intervals over which reference masses of fuel are introduced to the fuel measurement system. The reference fuel mass divided by the time interval is the reference fuel flow rate.

(5) Flow rates—inlet air, dilution air, diluted exhaust, raw exhaust, or sample flow. Use a reference flow meter with a blower or pump to simulate flow rates. Use a restrictor, diverter valve, a variable-speed blower or a variable-speed pump to control the range of flow rates. Use the reference meter's response as the reference values.

(i) Reference flow meters. Because the flow range requirements for these various flows are large, we allow a variety of reference meters. For example, for diluted exhaust flow for a full-flow dilution system, we recommend a reference subsonic venturi flow meter with a restrictor valve and a blower to simulate flow rates. For inlet air, dilution air, diluted exhaust for partial-flow dilution, raw exhaust, or sample flow, we allow reference meters such as critical flow orifices, critical flow venturis, laminar flow elements, master mass flow standards, or Roots meters. Make sure the reference meter is calibrated by the flow-meter manufacturer and its calibration is NIST-traceable. If you use the difference of two flow measurements to determine a net flow rate, you may use one of the measurements as a reference for the other.

(ii) Reference flow values. Because the reference flow is not absolutely constant, sample and record values of n refi for 30 seconds and use the arithmetic mean of the values, n ref, as the reference value. Refer to § 1065.602 for an example of calculating arithmetic mean.

(6) Gas division. Use one of the two reference signals:

(i) At the outlet of the gas-division system, connect a gas analyzer that meets the linearity verification described in this section and has not been linearized with the gas divider being verified. For example, verify the linearity of an analyzer using a series of reference analytical gases directly from compressed gas cylinders that meet the specifications of § 1065.750. We recommend using a FID analyzer or a PMD or MPD O2 analyzer because of their inherent linearity. Operate this analyzer consistent with how you would operate it during an emission test. Connect a span gas to the gas-divider inlet. Use the gas-division system to divide the span gas with purified air or nitrogen. Select gas divisions that you typically use. Use a selected gas division as the measured value. Use the analyzer response divided by the span gas concentration as the reference gas-division value. Because the instrument response is not absolutely constant, sample and record values of x refi for 30 seconds and use the arithmetic mean of the values, x ref, as the reference value. Refer to § 1065.602 for an example of calculating arithmetic mean.

(ii) Using good engineering judgment and gas divider manufacturer recommendations, use one or more reference flow meters to measure the flow rates of the gas divider and verify the gas-division value.

(7) Continuous constituent concentration. For reference values, use a series of gas cylinders of known gas concentration or use a gas-division system that is known to be linear with a span gas. Gas cylinders, gas-division systems, and span gases that you use for reference values must meet the specifications of § 1065.750.

(8) Temperature. You may perform the linearity verification for temperature measurement systems with thermocouples, RTDs, and thermistors by removing the sensor from the system and using a simulator in its place. Use a NIST-traceable simulator that is independently calibrated and, as appropriate, cold-junction compensated. The simulator uncertainty scaled to temperature must be less than 0.5% of T max. If you use this option, you must use sensors that the supplier states are accurate to better than 0.5% of T max compared with their standard calibration curve.

(9) Mass. For linearity verification for gravimetric PM balances, use external calibration weights that that meet the requirements in § 1065.790.

(e) Measurement systems that require linearity verification. Table 1 of this section indicates measurement systems that require linearity verifications, subject to the following provisions:

(1) Perform a linearity verification more frequently based on the instrument manufacturer's recommendation or good engineering judgment.

(2) The expression “x min ” refers to the reference value used during the linearity verification that is closest to zero. This is the value used to calculate the first tolerance in Table 1 of this section using the intercept, a 0. Note that this value may be zero, positive, or negative depending on the reference values. For example, if the reference values chosen to validate a pressure transducer vary from −10 to −1 kPa, x min is −1 kPa. If the reference values used to validate a temperature device vary from 290 to 390 K, x min is 290 K.

(3) The expression “max” generally refers to the absolute value of the reference value used during the linearity verification that is furthest from zero. This is the value used to scale the first and third tolerances in Table 1 of this section using a 0 and SEE. For example, if the reference values chosen to validate a pressure transducer vary from −10 to −1 kPa, then p max is 10 kPa. If the reference values used to validate a temperature device vary from 290 to 390 K, then T max is 390 K. For gas dividers where “max” is expressed as, x max /x span; x max is the maximum gas concentration used during the verification, x span is the undivided, undiluted, span gas concentration, and the resulting ratio is the maximum divider point reference value used during the verification (typically 1). The following are special cases where “max” refers to a different value:

(i) For linearity verification with a PM balance, m max refers to the typical mass of a PM filter.

(ii) For linearity verification of torque on the engine's primary output shaft, T max refers to the manufacturer's specified engine torque peak value of the lowest torque engine to be tested.

(4) The specified ranges are inclusive. For example, a specified range of 0.98-1.02 for a 1 means 0.98≤a 1 ≤1.02.

(5) These linearity verifications are optional for systems that pass the flow-rate verification for diluted exhaust as described in § 1065.341 (the propane check) or for systems that agree within ±2% based on a chemical balance of carbon or oxygen of the intake air, fuel, and exhaust.

(6) You must meet the a 1 criteria for these quantities only if the absolute value of the quantity is required, as opposed to a signal that is only linearly proportional to the actual value.

(7) Linearity checks are required for the following temperature measurements:

(i) The following temperature measurements always require linearity checks:

(A) Air intake.

(B) Aftertreatment bed(s), for engines tested with aftertreatment devices subject to cold-start testing.

(D) PM sample, if applicable.

(E) Chiller sample, for gaseous sampling systems that use thermal chillers to dry samples and use chiller temperature to calculate the dewpoint at the outlet of the chiller. For your testing, if you choose to use a high alarm temperature setpoint for the chiller temperature as a constant value in the amount of water calculations in § 1065.645, you may use good engineering judgment to verify the accuracy of the high alarm temperature setpoint in lieu of the linearity verification on the chiller temperature. We recommend that you input a reference simulated temperature signal below the alarm trip point, increase this signal until the high alarm trips, and verify that the alarm trip point value is no less than 2.0 °C below the reference value at the trip point.

(ii) Linearity checks are required for the following temperature measurements if these temperature measurements are specified by the engine manufacturer:

(A) Fuel inlet.

(B) Air outlet to the test cell's charge air cooler air outlet, for engines tested with a laboratory heat exchanger that simulates an installed charge air cooler.

(C) Coolant inlet to the test cell's charge air cooler, for engines tested with a laboratory heat exchanger that simulates an installed charge air cooler.

(D) Oil in the sump/pan.

(E) Coolant before the thermostat, for liquid-cooled engines.

(8) Linearity checks are required for the following pressure measurements:

(i) The following pressure measurements always require linearity checks:

(A) Air intake restriction.

(B) Exhaust back pressure.

(D) CVS inlet gage pressure.

(E) Sample dryer, for gaseous sampling systems that use either osmotic-membrane or thermal chillers to dry samples. For your testing, if you choose to use a low alarm pressure setpoint for the sample dryer pressure as a constant value in the amount of water calculations in § 1065.645, you may use good engineering judgment to verify the accuracy of the low alarm pressure setpoint in lieu of the linearity verification on the sample dryer pressure. We recommend that you input a reference pressure signal above the alarm trip point, decrease this signal until the low alarm trips, and verify that the trip point value is no more than 4.0 kPa above the reference value at the trip point.

(ii) Linearity checks are required for the following pressure measurements if these pressure measurements are specified by the engine manufacturer:

(A) The test cell's charge air cooler and interconnecting pipe pressure drop, for turbo-charged engines tested with a laboratory heat exchanger that simulates an installed charge air cooler.

(B) Fuel outlet.

Table 1 of § 1065.307 —Measurement Systems That Require Linearity Verifications—continued

Measurementsystem	Quantity	Minimum verification frequency	Linearity criteria
Measurementsystem	Quantity	Minimum verification frequency	\|xmin(a1−1) a0 \|	a1	SEE	r2
Speed	f n	Within 370 days before testing	≤0.05% · f nmax	0.98-1.02	≤2% · f nmax	≥0.990
Torque	T	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · T max	0.98-1.02	≤2% · T max	≥0.990
Electrical power	P	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · P max	0.98-1.02	≤2% · P max	≥0.990
Fuel flow rate	m	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · m max	0.98-1.02	≤2% · m max	>0.990
Intake-air flow rate	n	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · n max	0.98-1.02	≤2% · n max	≥0.990
Dilution air flow rate	n	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · n max	0.98-1.02	≤2% · n max	≥0.990
Diluted exhaustflow rate.	n	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · n max	0.98-1.02	≤2% · n max	≥0.990
Code of Federal Regulations 619
Raw exhaust flow rate	n	Within 185 days before testing	≤1% · n max	0.98-1.02	≤2% · n max	≥0.990
Batch sampler flow rates	n	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · n max	0.98-1.02	≤2% · n max	≥0.990
Gas dividers	x/x span	Within 370 days before testing	≤0.5% · x max/x span	0.98-1.02	≤2% · x max/x span	>0.990
Gas analyzers for laboratory testing	x	Within 35 days before testing	≤0.5% · x max	0.99-1.01	≤1% · x max	≥0.998
Gas analyzers for field testing	x	Within 35 days before testing	≤1% · x max	0.99-1.01	≤1% · x max	≥0.998
PM balance	m	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · m max	0.99-1.01	≤1% · m max	≥0.998
Pressures	p	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · p max	0.99-1.01	≤1% · p max	≥0.998
Dewpoint for intake air, PM-stabilization and balance environments	T dew	Within 370 days before testing	≤0.5% · T dewmax	0.99-1.01	≤0.5% · T dewmax	≥0.998
Other dewpoint measurements	T dew	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · T dewmax	0.99-1.01	≤1% · T dewmax	≥0.998
Analog-to-digital conversion of temperature signals	T	Within 370 days before testing	≤1% · T max	0.99-1.01	≤1% · T max	≥0.998

Code of Federal Regulations

[70 FR 40516, July 13, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 37302, June 30, 2008; 73 FR 59325, Oct. 8, 2008; 74 FR 56513, Oct. 30, 2009; 75 FR 23037, Apr. 30, 2010; 75 FR 68462, Nov. 8, 2010]

CFR

1065.307—Linearity verification.

Code of Federal Regulations